Welcome! Please contribute your ideas for what challenges we might aspire to solve, changes in our community that can improve machine learning impact, and examples of machine learning projects that have had tangible impact.
Lacking context for this site? Read the original paper: Machine Learning that Matters (ICML 2012). You can also review the slides.
Break long journal papers into smaller publishable units
  • Here is an interesting suggestion from the field of biomedicine, to address the gradually increasing length of typical journal papers:

    In machine learning (and much of computer science), there is a venue for smaller publishable units: peer-reviewed conference papers.  However, these have their own weaknesses (e.g., one-shot reviewing), and despite the shorter format (typically 8-9 pages), reviewers still push for a "complete story" to emerge.  What if we focused conference papers on single experiments and results?  Or published short-form journal papers (where a complete review/revision cycle can be performed)?  Would there be increased value and readability, or too much fragmentation?  Is this relevant for ML?


To post or add a comment, please sign in or register.

Tip: click the star icon to bookmark (follow) a discussion. You will receive email notifications of subsequent activity.
If search doesn't work, try putting a + in front of your search term.