{"id":1640,"date":"2010-12-30T14:30:34","date_gmt":"2010-12-30T22:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/?p=1640"},"modified":"2011-01-02T17:10:31","modified_gmt":"2011-01-03T01:10:31","slug":"off-to-mars-to-stay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/?p=1640","title":{"rendered":"Off to Mars &#8212; to stay"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/whyfiles.org\/194spa_travel\/images\/mars.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=floatRight width=150 src=\"http:\/\/whyfiles.org\/194spa_travel\/images\/mars.gif\"><\/a>Could it make sense to take a one-way trip to Mars?  This notion has been floating around for years, but it got some recent press when Drs. Schulze-Makuch and Davies published a paper titled <a href=\"http:\/\/journalofcosmology.com\/Mars108.html\">&#8220;To Boldly Go: A One-Way Human Mission to Mars.&#8221;<\/a>  Their thesis is that this might be the solution to several of the barriers to a crewed mission, providing among other benefits a major reduction in mission cost (up to 80% reduction, which is pretty dramatic!).  This can only be accomplished by shifting our perspective on what such a mission is: not a there-and-back-again jaunt like a trip to the Moon, but the establishment of a sustained presence on Mars, paving the way for future colonists and expeditions.  Schulze-Makuch and Davies declare that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n&#8220;&#8230; to attain it would require not only major international cooperation, but a return to the exploration spirit and risk-taking ethos of the great period of Earth exploration, from Columbus to Amundsen, but which has nowadays been replaced with a culture of safety and political correctness.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The initial reaction to a one-way trip concept is often one that assumes that the humans involved would immediately expire at the end of their mission.  &#8220;One-way&#8221; sounds like &#8220;suicide&#8221;.  But it&#8217;s not more of a &#8220;suicide&#8221; than inhabiting Earth, which is just as much of an ultimate death sentence &#8212; we just don&#8217;t think of it that way.  Well supplied and informed, an expedition to Mars could survive for a long time, albeit in a harsh and demanding environment.  They might not live as long as they would on Earth &#8212; or they might live longer; no one&#8217;s going to get hit by a car on Mars!  And just think of the amazing accomplishments this group of 21st-century pioneers would attain, in technology and in science, and also in poetry and psychology: making Mars a human location, not just a light in the sky.<\/p>\n<p>This short paper is definitely worth reading to see how Schulze-Makush and Davies set out the arguments for, and the conceptual design of, such a one-way mission.  I was heartened to see their clear statement that &#8220;No base on the Moon is needed to launch a one-way human mission to Mars.&#8221;  This is true of any mission to Mars, but has become somewhat lost in the various Constellation program discussions.<\/p>\n<p>If there really were an opportunity to volunteer for a one-way mission to Mars, where you&#8217;d live out your days in a &#8220;cave-centered biosphere&#8221;, exploring and discovering and serving as a pathfinder for future advances &#8212; I&#8217;d sign up in a heartbeat.  It&#8217;s difficult to think of any more important and meaningful goal to which I could devote my life here on Earth.  (I know some, or all, of you will disagree with me on this, which neither offends nor dissuades me in the least. :) )<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Could it make sense to take a one-way trip to Mars? This notion has been floating around for years, but it got some recent press when Drs. Schulze-Makuch and Davies published a paper titled &#8220;To Boldly Go: A One-Way Human Mission to Mars.&#8221; Their thesis is that this might be the solution to several of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[36,14,10,31],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1640"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1640"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1640\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1657,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1640\/revisions\/1657"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}