{"id":2865,"date":"2012-08-28T23:07:52","date_gmt":"2012-08-29T06:07:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/?p=2865"},"modified":"2012-08-28T23:07:52","modified_gmt":"2012-08-29T06:07:52","slug":"first-impressions-of-library-and-information-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/?p=2865","title":{"rendered":"First impressions of Library and Information Science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Week 1 of LIBR 200, &#8220;Information and Society&#8221;, has begun.  I dove eagerly into our textbook, &#8220;Foundations of Library and Information Science&#8221; by Richard E. Rubin.  Since we don&#8217;t have in-person meetings for interaction and discussion, instead we&#8217;re required to post to an online discussion forum about what we learned from our reading.  And hey, here&#8217;s where I also like to post about What I Learned!<\/p>\n<h3>What is library and information science?<\/h3>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=floatRight width=150 src=\"http:\/\/www.neal-schuman.com\/uploads\/products\/2010W50\/0424-foundations-of-library-and-information-science--third-edition-gallery-2-240x350.png\">The element of our assigned reading that struck me most was the open portrayal of Library and Information Science (LIS) as a field with something of an identity crisis. There&#8217;s an ongoing debate about whether it&#8217;s all about libraries, &#8220;librarianship&#8221;, service, and education, or whether it&#8217;s more about information, technology, and data, perhaps prioritizing knowledge over people.  Information technology obviously is a major help in providing services to library patrons, which is where the line gets blurred.  But how much of this can be said to be &#8220;science&#8221;?  How much of it needs to be?  How much should LIS &#8220;compete&#8221; with fields like &#8220;computer science and business administration&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>It is a novel experience for me to see a field deliberately asking existential questions of itself.  My prior education is in computer science and geology.  Only rarely do questions arise such as &#8220;Why do we study computer science?&#8221; or &#8220;How can geology stay relevant to today&#8217;s public?&#8221; or &#8220;How should computer science distinguish itself from mathematics, engineering, and information technology?&#8221;  I was astonished, and delighted, to see these big-picture questions being raised as one of the first topics in this introductory course.  Indeed.  Why does it matter?<\/p>\n<p>Further, this is evidently not a side topic that attracts the attention of only a few individuals, but instead a pivotal issue in how the field defines itself.  These questions convey a sensitive humility, in contrast to an academic arrogance that assumes whatever the field carves out for itself is axiomatically important.  They can only arise from a community that genuinely cares about staying relevant, and therefore notices when changes occur in the needs and habits of its primary users or beneficiaries.  Perhaps this is what distinguishes a service profession from a science or engineering field.  I find the intense push to stay relevant and useful to be refreshing and motivating.  One of the primary reasons I volunteer at the library is that it gives me a direct connection to helping people, something that is rather missing from my research position at NASA.<\/p>\n<h3>How should Library and Information Science be taught?<\/h3>\n<p>I was also fascinated by a historical discussion of how librarians were and are trained, and the evolving debate about what information and skills they need.  It is a bit odd to be told, just as we&#8217;re beginning our studies, that the field itself isn&#8217;t quite sure what we should be learning.  There is no agreement on a basic shared curriculum beyond a few core classes (organization of information, reference, foundations, and management (!)).  But once again, I find this openness refreshing, and being presented with these questions up front feels like an invitation to get involved in the conversation.  <\/p>\n<p>I did wish that Rubin&#8217;s book were a little more updated.  Despite being a 2010 edition, most of the heavily researched statistics (e.g., on media consumption or librarian demographics) come from 2004-2008, and I kept wanting to know what the current values were.  Most jarringly, the section titled &#8220;Looking to the Future&#8221; relies primarily on a study published in 2000 (Rubin p. 110).  How many of the six identified trends still hold?  What about the future beyond 2012?  A description of &#8220;the librarian of the twenty-first century&#8221; is quoted on p. 112 that comes from a 1985 paper (Debons, 1985)!  These outdated references are at odds with the text&#8217;s intended message about the necessity of adapting to a rapid rate of changes in patrons and the workplace.  <\/p>\n<p>What spoke to me most was the view that &#8220;LIS professionals are educators, enriching the lives of others through their advice and guidance&#8221; (Rubin p. 119).  That is what I would like to aspire to in my studies, in my time at the library, and truly, in how I interact with all whom I encounter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Week 1 of LIBR 200, &#8220;Information and Society&#8221;, has begun. I dove eagerly into our textbook, &#8220;Foundations of Library and Information Science&#8221; by Richard E. Rubin. Since we don&#8217;t have in-person meetings for interaction and discussion, instead we&#8217;re required to post to an online discussion forum about what we learned from our reading. And hey, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[64],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2865"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2865"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2865\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2874,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2865\/revisions\/2874"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wkiri.com\/today\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}